In 1968 Morgan Guaranty launched Euro-Clear, a Brussels-based bank clearing system for Eurodollar securities. It was the first such automated endeavor. Some took to calling Euro-Clear “The Beast”. Brussels serves as headquarters for the new European Central Bank and for NATO. In 1973 Morgan officials met secretly in Bermuda to illegally resurrect the old House of Morgan, twenty years before Glass Steagal Act was repealed. Morgan and the Rockefellers provided the financial backing for Merrill Lynch, boosting it into the Big 5 of US investment banking. Merrill is now part of Bank of America.
John D. Rockefeller used his oil wealth to acquire Equitable Trust, which had gobbled up several large banks and corporations by the 1920’s. The Great Depression helped consolidate Rockefeller’s power. His Chase Bank merged with Kuhn Loeb’s Manhattan Bank to form Chase Manhattan, cementing a long-time family relationship. The Kuhn-Loeb’s had financed – along with Rothschilds – Rockefeller’s quest to become king of the oil patch. National City Bank of Cleveland provided John D. with the money needed to embark upon his monopolization of the US oil industry. The bank was identified in Congressional hearings as being one of three Rothschild-owned banks in the US during the 1870’s, when Rockefeller first incorporated as Standard Oil of Ohio.
Taylor Swift was born into wealth. Her father is “a descendant of three generations of bank presidents” and worked for Merrill Lynch.
RECOMMENDED READING:
Crash of the Titans: Greed, Hubris, the Fall of Merrill Lynch, and the Near-Collapse of Bank of America. by Greg Farrell
The intersection of anti-Semitism, Donald Trump, and assassination as a topic is complex and sensitive. Here’s a careful breakdown of each aspect:
Anti-Semitism
Definition: Anti-Semitism refers to hostility, prejudice, or discrimination against Jewish people. This can manifest in various forms, including derogatory remarks, conspiracy theories, and physical violence.
Impact: Anti-Semitism has led to historical tragedies, most notably the Holocaust, and continues to be a serious issue globally, contributing to violence and discrimination against Jewish communities.
Donald Trump and Anti-Semitism
Incidents and Statements: During and after his presidency, Donald Trump has been associated with various controversies involving anti-Semitic rhetoric or actions. Some supporters and opponents have interpreted his statements and policies as either combating or inadvertently encouraging anti-Semitism.
Jewish Supporters and Critics: Trump has both supporters and critics within the Jewish community. His policies regarding Israel, for example, garnered significant support from some Jewish groups, while others criticized him for enabling a rise in white nationalist sentiment.
Assassination
Historical Context: Assassinations of political figures have occurred throughout history, often with significant political ramifications. Discussing or speculating about the assassination of any public figure, including Donald Trump, is a highly sensitive and potentially dangerous topic.
Legal and Ethical Considerations: Making threats or even discussing the assassination of a public figure can be illegal and unethical. It is important to approach such topics with caution and responsibility.
Addressing the Topics
Combating Anti-Semitism: Efforts to fight anti-Semitism include education, legislation, and promoting interfaith and intercultural dialogue. Public figures play a crucial role in denouncing hate speech and promoting inclusivity.
Political Discourse: Discussions about political figures should focus on their policies and actions rather than inciting or entertaining thoughts of violence. Constructive criticism and peaceful protest are foundational to democratic societies.
Security and Safety: Public figures, including former presidents, receive security to protect them from threats. It is essential to respect and support measures that ensure their safety.
Conclusion
Addressing the issues of anti-Semitism and political violence requires a careful, respectful approach. Encouraging dialogue that promotes understanding and condemns hate speech and violence is essential for a healthy and safe society. If you have specific questions or concerns related to these topics, feel free to ask in a responsible and constructive manner.
The World Trade Center (WTC) conspiracy theories revolve around the events of September 11, 2001, when terrorists hijacked four airplanes, crashing two into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, one into the Pentagon, and the fourth into a field in Pennsylvania. These theories question the official account provided by the U.S. government and suggest alternative explanations for the events. Here are some of the main conspiracy theories and the evidence typically cited for and against them:
1. Inside Job Theory
Claim: The U.S. government or elements within it orchestrated or allowed the attacks to justify subsequent wars and increase governmental control.
Evidence Cited by Theorists:
Building 7 (WTC 7): The collapse of WTC 7, a 47-story building that was not directly hit by an airplane, is cited as suspicious. The building collapsed in a manner resembling a controlled demolition.
NORAD Stand Down: Delayed response by NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) is suggested as evidence of complicity or a deliberate stand-down order.
Financial Gains: Claims that insiders profited from stock trades made before the attacks (e.g., put options on airlines).
Counter-Evidence:
Official Reports: The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) attributed the collapse of WTC 7 to uncontrolled fires ignited by debris from the collapse of the North Tower.
NORAD Confusion: The delayed military response was due to confusion and lack of preparedness for such an unprecedented attack.
Stock Trades: Investigations found no evidence of insider trading linked to 9/11.
2. Controlled Demolition Theory
Claim: The Twin Towers were brought down by pre-planted explosives or thermite, not by the plane impacts and resulting fires alone.
Evidence Cited by Theorists:
Free-Fall Speed: The speed of the collapse and the symmetrical fall of the buildings suggest controlled demolition.
Molten Metal: Reports of molten metal found in the debris, suggesting the use of explosives or thermite.
Counter-Evidence:
Structural Failure: The official explanation is that the impact of the planes and the fires weakened the steel framework of the buildings, leading to a progressive collapse.
Thermite Debunked: Experts argue that the presence of molten metal can be explained by the intense fires and the materials involved in the buildings’ construction.
3. Pentagon Attack Theories
Claim: The Pentagon was not hit by American Airlines Flight 77 but by a missile or another aircraft.
Evidence Cited by Theorists:
Small Impact Hole: The initial impact hole in the Pentagon is argued to be too small for a commercial airliner.
Lack of Debris: Theorists claim there was a lack of visible aircraft debris at the Pentagon crash site.
Counter-Evidence:
Eyewitness Accounts: Numerous eyewitnesses saw the plane hit the Pentagon.
Aircraft Debris: Investigators and photos confirmed the presence of aircraft debris consistent with a Boeing 757.
4. Foreknowledge and Israeli Involvement
Claim: Certain individuals or groups had prior knowledge of the attacks, including theories suggesting involvement by the Israeli government or Mossad.
Evidence Cited by Theorists:
“Dancing Israelis”: Five Israelis were arrested after being seen filming and allegedly celebrating the attacks.
Warnings to Officials: Claims that some officials received warnings not to fly or to avoid certain areas.
Counter-Evidence:
Debunked Claims: Investigations into the “Dancing Israelis” found no evidence of foreknowledge or involvement.
Routine Warnings: No credible evidence supports the claim that specific warnings were given to individuals to avoid the attacks.
Conclusion
The 9/11 conspiracy theories remain a topic of significant debate and interest, fueled by skepticism of the official narrative and the monumental impact of the events. However, the majority of experts and investigations have found that the evidence supports the official account of the attacks as carried out by Al-Qaeda terrorists. Various independent investigations and peer-reviewed studies have reinforced the findings of the 9/11 Commission and other official reports.
