Cold Fusion Proven True

The Saint Cold Fusion

(NaturalNews) The world owes Fleischmann and Pons a huge apology: The cold fusion technology they announced in 1989 — which was blasted by arrogant hot fusion scientists as a fraud — has been proven true once again by U.S. Navy Researchers. In papers presented at this year’s American Chemical Society meeting, scientist Pamela Mosier-Boss presented data supporting the reality of cold fusion, declaring the report, “the first scientific report of highly energetic neutrons from low-energy nuclear reactions.”Technically, it’s not the first report at all, however. It might be the five-hundredth report, given how many people have been working on cold fusion since 1989 in laboratories across the world. Following the politically-motivated assassination of cold fusion credibility in 1989, the cold fusion movement went underground, renaming itself to LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions). As LENR, cold fusion has been proven true in literally thousands of experiments conducted over the past two decades.

I first went public with the true story about the conspiracy against cold fusion in 1998. It described this classic conspiracy against a new technology, schemed up by desperate defenders of old technology — hot fusion researchers who, after hundreds of billions of dollars in research money, have yet to produce a single sustainable hot fusion reaction that produces more energy than it consumes. The arrogant hot fusion researchers have the same snooty attitude as cancer researchers: “Just give us another billion dollars,” they say, “and we’ll find a cure!”

It’s been the same story for nearly three decades now, and hot fusion still doesn’t work. A working cold fusion unit, however, can be built on a kitchen countertop for less than $2,000, and it doesn’t require a doctorate in physics to pull it off, either. It is precisely this simplicity that offends the arrogant hot fusion pushers who act much like medical doctors in the vicious defense of their territory.

Cold fusion applications

Cold fusion isn’t some magical free energy machine. It produces excess heat, but slowly. So don’t go thinking this is some kind of Mr. Fusion device that you can feed some banana peels and expect to get clean electricity out the other end.

Rather, cold fusion converts mass to heat energy, slowly losing a bit of mass through very low-energy nuclear reactions (hence the LENR name) that generate excess heat. In practical terms, cold fusion produces hot water.

And why is hot water useful? Because with hot water, you can produce steam. Steam turns turbines that generate electricity. This is how coal power plants work, too, except they’re burning coal to heat water instead of using cold fusion. Conventional nuke plants work the same way, too, using much higher-energy nuclear reactions to heat vast amounts of water that drive electricity-generating turbines.

So heating water with cold fusion is a big deal. If the technology can be scaled up and applied properly, it could spell an end to the era of dirty coal power plants.

And that, friends, could mean a very big deal for reducing CO2 emissions and avoiding a worsening of global warming. It will even help global warming skeptics, too, because even if you don’t believe global warming is real, the climate still changes on you. Mother Nature can’t be debated. It just reacts.

Whether you recognize the reality of global warming or not, cold fusion technology could reduce air pollution due to coal power plant emissions. Coal power plants are the No. 1 source of mercury pollution on our planet, in case you didn’t know. That’s because burning coal spews mercury into the air, which then contaminates oceans and land masses, contaminating the world with mercury.

(Perhaps there are mercury skeptics who do not believe coal power plants spew mercury at all, or that mercury is safe for human consumption. The mercury skeptics are probably dentists, come to think of it…)

No radioactive waste

Cold fusion, by the way, does not produce radioactive waste. So it’s not like a world full of cold fusion power plants would create yet another radioactive waste problem. It might cause a shortage of palladium, though, which is one of the metals typically used in cold fusion devices.

Some of the more astute readers of this website will probably figure out that investing in palladium futures ahead of any widespread production of cold fusion devices would no doubt be extremely profitable. But that kind of product rollout is likely years away, at best.

And that’s assuming that this latest round of cold fusion announcements won’t get clobbered yet again by the hot fusion conspirators. I’m half expecting an updated news announcement in a day or two, with a headline like, “U.S. Navy Retracts Cold Fusion Announcement, Scientists Accused of Fraud” or some such nonsense. If you see such a headline, remember what you’re reading here, and you’ll know it’s all been manipulated to erase the reality of cold fusion from the sphere of public knowledge.

Cold fusion, after all, could revolutionize the energy industry and spell doom for coal and natural gas. I know a bunch of executives in Wyoming who are shaking in their (insulated) boots right now at the thought of cold fusion sidelining natural gas.

Authors’ Quotes on Cold Fusion

Below, you’ll find selected quotes from noted authors on the subject of Cold Fusion. Feel free to quote these in your own work provided you give proper credit to both the original author quoted here and this NaturalNews page.

Nowhere are the resistance to and promise of a new energy technology more dramatically revealed than those of the case of cold fusion. This well-researched approach has the potential of reversing much of the pollution while turning the interests of the energy monopolies upside down. Unfortunately, even the environmentalists haven’t yet given new energy alternatives a fair look. The cold fusion Revolution: The unfolding cold fusion saga has provided us with an illustrious thirteen year history that would make the suppression of Tesla seem like a school exercise.
Reinheriting the Earth: Awakening to Sustainable Solutions and Greater Truths by Brian O’Leary
Available on Amazon.com

The coup de grace was delivered to cold fusion when the US House committee formed to examine the claims for cold fusion came down on the side of the skeptics. ‘Evidence for the discovery of a new nuclear process termed cold fusion is not persuasive,’ said its report. ‘No special programmes to establish cold fusion research centers or to support new efforts to find cold fusion are justified.’
Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific Establishment by Richard Milton
Available on Amazon.com

Cold fusion The fusion of hydrogen atoms into helium at room temperature. In 1989 two scientists announced that they had produced cold fusion in their laboratory, an achievement that if true would have meant a virtually unlimited cheap energy supply for humanity. When other scientists were unable to reproduce their results, the scientific community concluded that the original experiment had been flawed.
The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know by E. D. Hirsch, Joseph F. Kett, James Trefil
Available on Amazon.com

Thus within two months of its original announcement, cold fusion had been dealt a fatal blow by two of the world’s most prestigious nuclear research centres, each receiving millions of pounds a year to fund atomic research. The measure of MIT’s success in killing off cold fusion is that still today, the US Department of Energy refuses to fund any research into it while the US Patent Office relies on the MIT report to refuse any patents based on or relating to cold fusion processes even though hundreds have been submitted.
Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific Establishment by Richard Milton
Available on Amazon.com

Patent Office of any application mentioning cold fusion; 3) Suppression of research on the phenomenon in government laboratories; 4) Citation of cold fusion as “pathological science” or “fraud” in numerous books and articles critical of cold fusion in general, and of Fleischmann and Pons in particular.” One of the DOE panel members, Prof. Steven Koonin of Caltech (and now Provost there), said, “My conclusion is that the experiments are just wrong and that we are suffering from the incompetence and delusion of Doctors Pons and Fleischmann…
Reinheriting the Earth: Awakening to Sustainable Solutions and Greater Truths by Brian O’Leary
Available on Amazon.com

Six months after cold fusion was announced, the American Department of Energy denounced it. In Japan, the people who are considered authorities blindly emulated the attitude of the Americans, as they invariably do, and they too pontificated against cold fusion. Perhaps it was inevitable that most people would assume the claims are cock and bull nonsense. In keeping with the tide of the times, countless books and articles have been published attacking cold fusion. The very act of researching cold fusion has become scandalous.
Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific Establishment by Richard Milton
Available on Amazon.com

Equally illuminating were the remarks of Professor John Huizenga, who was co-chairman of the US Department of Energy’s panel on cold fusion and who came down against the reality of the process. In a recent book on the subject, Professor Huizenga observed that ‘The world’s scientific institutions have probably now squandered between $50 and $100 million on an idea that was absurd to begin with.’ The question is, what were his principal reasons for rejecting cold fusion.
Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific Establishment by Richard Milton
Available on Amazon.com

This was perhaps the high-water mark of cold fusion. Scores of organisations over the world were actively working to replicate cold fusion in their laboratories, and although many reported difficulties a decent number reported success. And by the end of April, Fleischmann and Pons were standing before the US House Science, Space and Technology committee asking for a cool $25 million to fund a centre for cold fusion research at Utah University. Then things began to go wrong.
Alternative Science: Challenging the Myths of the Scientific Establishment by Richard Milton
Available on Amazon.com

What do you think of this post?
  • Interesting (3)
  • Awesome (2)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

5 thoughts on “Cold Fusion Proven True

  1. U.S. LENR Manhattan Project – U.S. Advanced LENR Technology

    It is the mission of the DoE, DoD, and NASA to ensure U.S. technological superiority as a matter of national security

    Frank Carlucci was head of the DoD in 1989. Now he is on the board of directors of Global Energy Corporation along with two Congressmen with licence to market advanced Navy LENR technology that transmutes nuclear waste to benign elements while creating high process steam. This has not been presented to the LENR or the nuclear waste remediation scientific communities.

    Patents filed in 2007 and 2008 – One was sequestered till 2013

    System and Method for Generating Particles
    https://www.google.com/patents/US8419919

    Hybrid Fusion Fast Fission Reactor
    http://www.google.com/patents/WO2009108331A3?cl=en

    Mineta, Davis, Carlucci, Global Energy Corporation, LENR, Navy, Guam

    Mineta, Davis, Carlucci, Global Energy Corporation, LENR, Navy, Guam

    Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle became the first Associate Administrator of the Office of Exploration Systems at NASA in 2003, serving under President Bush. Adm. Steidle also served as the Director of the Department of Defense (DoD) Joint Advanced Strike Technology Office and was the Director of the Joint Strike Fighter Program, DoD’s largest program. He is now on the board of directors of Seldon Technologies with two advanced LENR patents utilizing carbon nanotube technology, filed in 2013.

    Methods of Generating Energy and/or he-4 Using Graphene Based Materials
    https://www.google.com/patents/US20110255644

    Methods of Generating Energetic Particles Using Nanotubes and Articles Thereof
    http://www.google.com/patents/US20130266106

    Asleep at the Foot of the Bristlecone Pine

    Asleep at the Foot of the Bristlecone Pine

    NASA Advanced LENR Applied Engineering

    Low Energy Nuclear Reaction Aircraft Investigator(s): Doug Wells
    http://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/17WELLS_ABSTRACT.pdf

    Low Energy Nuclear Reaction Aircraft Seedling Technical Seminar
    February 19–27, 2014 http://nari.arc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/SeedlingWELLS.pdf

    SpaceWorks Engineering Advanced Concepts Group – NASA Contract 2009-2010
    LENR Spaceplanes Advanced Propulsion System Concept Studies (see page 31}
    http://www.sei.aero/eng/papers/uploads/archive/Advanced_Concepts_Group_ACG_Overview.pdf

    Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research Phase II: N+4 Advanced Concept Development
    http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/20120500NASA-CR-2012-217556-Subsonic-Ultra-Green.pdf

    The Working Group report from May 2012 states:

    “Even though we do not know the specific cost of the LENR itself, we assumed a cost of jet fuel at $4/gallon and weight based aircraft cost. We were able to calculate cost per mile for the LENR equipped aircraft compared to a conventional aircraft (Figure 3.2). Looking at the plots, one could select a point where the projected cost per mile is 33% less than a conventionally powered aircraft.”… pg 24.

    LENR Requirements Analysis… pg 24. View Figure 3.1

    Potential Heat Engines for LENR Systems… pg 25. View Figure 3.2

    Parametric LENR and Heat Engine Performance Parameters… pg 25. View Figure 6.2

    Low Energy Nuclear Reactor Technologies …pg 82.

    LENR Technologies Success Criteria …pg 86.

    Also LENR at pgs 15, 18, 19, 20, and 21.

    The NASA Working Group report also makes public the following list of organizations and individuals working on applied LENR engineering: Bradley (Boeing) * Daggett (Boeing) * Droney (Boeing) * Hoisington (Boeing) * Kirby (GT) * Murrow (GE) * Ran (GT) * Nam (GT) * Tai, (GT) * Hammel (GE) * Perullo (GT) * Guynn (NASA) * Olson (NASA) * Leavitt (NASA) * Allen (Boeing) * Cotes (Boeing) * Guo (Boeing) * Foist (Boeing) * Rawdon (Boeing) * Wakayama (Boeing) * Dallara (Boeing) * Kowalski (Boeing) * Wat (Boeing) * Robbana (Boeing) * Barmichev (Boeing) * Fink (Boeing) * Sankrithi (Boeing) * White (Boeing) * Gowda (GE) * Brown (NASA) * Wahls (NASA) * Wells (NASA) * Jeffries (FAA) * Felder (NASA) * Schetz (VT) * Burley (NASA) * Sequiera (FAA) * Martin (NASA) * Kapania (VT)

    Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] – NASA
    http://fedgeno.com/documents/future-strategic-issues-and-warfare.pdf

    Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] Dennis Bushnell – NASA – LENR

    Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] Dennis Bushnell – NASA – LENR

    This 113-page slide-show, from NASA
    June of 2013, lays out what we are preparing to prevent; by foreseeing what the capabilities of advanced technologies will bring to the theater of war.

    Dennis Bushnell is bringing everything out into the open for us to think about: these advanced warfare technologies are NOT something we can all just live with.

    They are difficult to defend against, and often untraceable; being cheap and easy to manufacture. They will be developed commercially, and very simply; without requiring any long-term governmental development like mega-trillion dollar stealth bombers, naval carriers, and observational platform programs.

    They are soon becoming commercially available, legally. Actions which classify these dangerous technologies as illegal are needed.

    Gregory Goble author archive at Cold Fusion Now http://coldfusionnow.org/author/gbgoble/

  2. Please provide link to Pamela Mosier-Boss presentation on Cold Fusion

  3. An outstanding share! I’ve just forwarded this onto a colleague who has been conducting a little research on this.
    And he actually bought me lunch because I stumbled upon it for him…
    lol. So allow me to reword this…. Thank YOU for the meal!!
    But yeah, thanks for spending the time to talk about this
    matter here on your internet site.

  4. Pingback: The truth about renewable energy – Renewable Energy Being Suppressed: | Conspirapedia

  5. That link to Future Strategic Issues/Future Warfare [Circa 2025] is super interesting. If this tech can filter to the common people it would vastly erode the power of the Satan worshiping elite. A couple smart guys in a basement could ruin their day.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 1,000 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here

Optionally add an image (JPEG only)

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.