Unknown's avatar

About Dr. Fishman

First, do no harm. Second, ask the patient if he/she can give up what made them sick. Third, food is the medicine.

Tolstoy on Doctors

Leo Tolstoy Doctors

I’m reading War and Peace now and will probably post a review here when I finish. I don’t remember how, but in childhood I managed to only read 1.5 of the novel’s 4 volumes, all of which must have been required at school. If I missed the rest of the book because I was out sick, then this post would be pretty fitting.

Tolstoy didn’t care the least bit about elegant prose or humor, but he wrote about a very interesting, no longer existing group of people (the Russian aristocracy) from an insider’s perspective and he had a lot of wisdom. He applied this wisdom to dozens of very diverse topics in this enormous book. I made this post about Tolstoy’s take on the medical profession because it completely agrees with mine.

In the third volume Natasha Rostova, one of the novel’s major characters, is suffering from teenage heartbreak, but her family mistakenly believes that her condition is more serious than that.

“She could not eat or sleep, grew visibly thinner, coughed, and, as the doctors made them feel, was in danger. They could not think of anything but how to help her. Doctors came to see her singly and in consultation, talked much in French, German, and Latin, blamed one another, and prescribed a great variety of medicines for all the diseases known to them, but the simple idea never occurred to any of them that they could not know the disease Natasha was suffering from, as no disease suffered by a live man can be known, for every living person has his own peculiarities and always has his own peculiar, personal, novel, complicated disease, unknown to medicine–not a disease of the lungs, liver, skin, heart, nerves, and so on mentioned in medical books, but a disease consisting of one of the innumerable combinations of the maladies of those organs. This simple thought could not occur to the doctors (as it cannot occur to a wizard that he is unable to work his charms) because the business of their lives was to cure, and they received money for it and had spent the best years of their lives on that business. But, above all, that thought was kept out of their minds by the fact that they saw they were really useful, as in fact they were to the whole Rostov family. Their usefulness did not depend on making the patient swallow substances for the most part harmful (the harm was scarcely perceptible, as they were given in small doses), but they were useful, necessary, and indispensable because they satisfied a mental need of the invalid and of those who loved her–and that is why there are, and always will be, pseudo-healers, wise women, homeopaths, and allopaths. They satisfied that eternal human need for hope of relief, for sympathy, and that something should be done, which is felt by those who are suffering. They satisfied the need seen in its most elementary form in a child, when it wants to have a place rubbed that has been hurt. A child knocks itself and runs at once to the arms of its mother or nurse to have the aching spot rubbed or kissed, and it feels better when this is done. The child cannot believe that the strongest and wisest of its people have no remedy for its pain, and the hope of relief and the expression of its mother’s sympathy while she rubs the bump comforts it. The doctors were of use to Natasha because they kissed and rubbed her bump, assuring her that it would soon pass if only the coachman went to the chemist’s in the Arbat and got a powder and some pills in a pretty box of a ruble and seventy kopeks, and if she took those powders in boiled water at intervals of precisely two hours, neither more nor less.

What would Sonya and the count and countess have done, how would they have looked, if nothing had been done, if there had not been those pills to give by the clock, the warm drinks, the chicken cutlets, and all the other details of life ordered by the doctors, the carrying out of which supplied an occupation and consolation to the family circle? How would the count have borne his dearly loved daughter’s illness had he not known that it was costing him a thousand rubles, and that he would not grudge thousands more to benefit her, or had he not known that if her illness continued he would not grudge yet other thousands and would take her abroad for consultations there, and had he not been able to explain the details of how Metivier and Feller had not understood the symptoms, but Frise had, and Mudrov had diagnosed them even better? What would the countess have done had she not been able sometimes to scold the invalid for not strictly obeying the doctor’s orders?

“You’ll never get well like that,” she would say, forgetting her grief in her vexation, “if you won’t obey the doctor and take your medicine at the right time! You mustn’t trifle with it, you know, or it may turn to pneumonia,” she would go on, deriving much comfort from the utterance of that foreign word, incomprehensible to others as well as to herself.

What would Sonya have done without the glad consciousness that she had not undressed during the first three nights, in order to be ready to carry out all the doctor’s injunctions with precision, and that she still kept awake at night so as not to miss the proper time when the slightly harmful pills in the little gilt box had to be administered? Even to Natasha herself it was pleasant to see that so many sacrifices were being made for her sake, and to know that she had to take medicine at certain hours, though she declared that no medicine would cure her and that it was all nonsense. And it was even pleasant to be able to show, by disregarding the orders, that she did not believe in medical treatment and did not value her life.

The symptoms of Natasha’s illness were that she ate little, slept little, coughed, and was always low-spirited. The doctors said that she could not get on without medical treatment, so they kept her in the stifling atmosphere of the town, and the Rostovs did not move to the country that summer of 1812.

In spite of the many pills she swallowed and the drops and powders out of the little bottles and boxes of which Madame Schoss who was fond of such things made a large collection, and in spite of being deprived of the country life to which she was accustomed, youth prevailed. Natasha’s grief began to be overlaid by the impressions of daily life, it ceased to press so painfully on her heart, it gradually faded into the past, and she began to recover physically.”

The average person reading this now probably thinks that that’s only how medicine was like then, that progress and technology have blah blah blah…

If Tolstoy’s description fit 95% of the medical practice of his day, then it would probably fit 70% of what’s going on in 2010. Medicine is still and probably will always be mostly like that.

From what I’ve read, Tolstoy practiced what he preached, never asking or following doctors’ advice and lived to the age of 82.

Being a glossophiliac, I can’t resist mentioning that the native Russian word for doctor (vrach) is etymologically related to the Russian word for lying (vrat’). Faith healers were habitually called liars by their customers. When Western medicine arrived in Russia, its typical practitioner seemed like just another type of faith healer, so the word vrach was applied to him as well. It is now roughly as popular as “doctor” in Russia, but with overuse has unfortunately lost its sting.

Glossy

Sugarfree Michael J. Fox Sips Liquid Parkinsons

Michael J Fox Aspartame Rumsfeld

By Fintan Dunne
Editor SickofDoctors.com
4-17-2


Michael J. Fox is still drinking the diet soda.

Many medical professionals and health activists loudly proclaim that aspartame sweetener in diet sodas causes symptoms that mimic, or accentuate Parkinson’s disease. The first class-action lawsuits have already been filed. Michael is diagnosed with Parkinson’s.

A prudent person might well have long ago eliminated the notorious additive from their diet. But, incredibly, Michael J. Fox seems to still be drinking the soda.

Before he appeared on last week’s Oprah show, promoting his new book “Lucky Man,” reporter Ann Oldenburg, for USA Today, interviewed him about his medical condition. She wrote:

“He just can’t sit still. Will that glass of diet soda make it to his lips without spilling? It does.”

Consider this: A man we all know and many love, sipping with trembling hands the very drink that may be slowly killing him. Unfortunately, this is not a scene from a movie. This is real life for Mr. Pepsi 1987.

THE CHOICE OF A HYPED GENERATION

Ironically, in the movie “Back to the Future,” Michael J. Fox is taken back in time to a soda fountain shop in the early nineteen fifties.

Michael’s character, Marty McFly, asks the man behind the counter for a diet soda: a “Pepsi Free.” The man behind the counter replies: “Nothing is free in here but water.” Then Fox asks for a “Tab” (another diet soda), and the man behind the counter states: “You don’t get a tab until you order something.”

That’s what they call run-of-film product placement. By means of star endorsements and in-movie placements, soda corporates have been spectacularly effective in getting us all to swallow their artificially colored, artificially flavored water.

Michael also starred in “Apartment 10G,” a 1987 Pepsi commercial with Gail O’Grady, of NYPD Blue, in which he risked life and limb running through rain, over car hoods, and through traffic to bring her a can of her favorite soda.

His love affair with the “free” goes back a long way. Michael Andrew Fox was born June 9 1961 in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Always diminutive, he longed to be taller. Michael read that eating made you grow, so he ate until he had gained 20lb in weight.

After early acting successes, he ended up in debt and selling off furniture to buy food. Michael felt he had to do something about his weight to improve his chances at casting sessions. He went on a crash diet. He stopped eating. From then on, the slimmed down star was a prime candidate for the diet sodas introduced around 1984.

When he appeared in the 1987 Pepsi commercial, their public relations people milked the star’s endorsement for all it’s worth. Michael spent countless hours clutching glasses of Pepsi, with his home refrigerator virtually patched into Pepsi’s production line. Michael was reportedly soon an avid consumer of Diet Pepsi.

That exposure set him up for a curious medical phenomenon: addiction to the substance causing the damage. Every free can came at a terrible hidden price. As the soda fountain storekeeper in ‘Back to the Future’ puts it: “nothing is free -but the water.”

THE VIRUS RED HERRING

Many doctors report improvement in chronic medical conditions when their patients avoid aspartame. However, the manufacturers, the US regulators and the Parkinson’s research establishment dismiss these reports as anecdotal. They insist that “scientific evidence” shows aspartame is safe.

In truth, their “science” is often just pseudoscientific claptrap. Their latest wild goose chase is that Parkinson’s may be linked to a virus. Even as Michael J. Fox currently tours the talk show circuit, the leading Canadian Parkinson’s researcher, Dr. Donald Calne, is reportedly heralding a possible viral cause of Parkinson’s.

His evidence? Three of Michael’s costars on a situation comedy called “Leo and Me” have also developed Parkinson’s disease. Dr. Calne, director of the Neurodegenerative Disorder Center at the University of British Columbia Hospital, theorizes that the four might have been exposed to a Parkinson’s trigger virus in the air conditioning system on the show’s production set.

Breathless and talk show hosts and fawning news reports reveal that four of the 125 people on the set of “Leo and Me” in 1976, are now diagnosed with Parkinson’s — compared to a national incidence of 1 in 300 people. Dr. Calne calculates the odds of such a cluster by chance at 1000 to 1.

Hold it right there! This data is statistical dross. This is EXACTLY the data clustering we would expect to find in a normal distribution of Parkinson’s among groups of less than 300 people. There will always be isolated incidences where there are congruencies. Conversely there will be also be a large number of population sets of 300 where there is no incidence of Parkinson’s whatsoever.

Surely the bell curve of a normal distribution is familiar to any student of Statistics 101. If the sample has only 125 people, you find precisely these variations. Only when the sample size is increased from hundreds — to hundreds of thousands, does the data approach meaningfulness.

If Dr. Calne’s pseudo-science is any indication, then Parkinson’s research is out to lunch. The same establishment which passes off such meaningless speculation as science, has the nerve to dismiss the experience of doctors as anecdotal and the concerns of the public as “nonscientific.” And, like Dr. Calne, they have control of the available research dollars.

Perhaps, after all, we had better carefully review the evidence so readily dismissed about the toxicity of aspartame.

FIRE ANTS AND HEAVY METAL

The establishment view is that ingestion of aspartame produces levels of toxins are typically insignificantly low. The critics say that aspartame is significantly metabolized in the body to aspartic acid, phenylalanine and methyl alcohol.

Aspartic acid is excitotoxic, it excites neurons or brain cells to death –thus the link to Parkinson’s. The methyl alcohol breaks down into formaldehyde, then formic acid. How dangerous are these toxins?

Consider fetal alcohol syndrome: it produces deformity and disability in infants who suffer maternal alcohol abuse. Yet, methyl alcohol is fifty times more potent than beverage alcohol. Formaldehyde is 5,000 times more potent. Critics say the combination is equivalent to ingesting deadly fire ant venom and embalming fluid – albeit in minuscule quantities.

Besides the direct effects of these toxins, there is evidence from research into Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative diseases that toxin-induced accumulation of metals in the brain is a key disease mechanism.

Much research into Parkinson’s in agricultural communities, has linked the disease with high exposure to pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers. Other research in mining communities has shown aluminum and manganese play a role in the degeneration. Besides it’s direct effects, aspartame may well also speed the brain’s uptake of these metals to toxic levels.

A significant minority of people are highly succeptible to these toxic effects. That’s why this writer, as a matter of personal health safety, will not be drinking a possible metal chleator in a beverage stored inside an aluminum can. Do I feel lucky, punk? No, not that lucky.

But our public health safety regulators are feeling very lucky. All the while, a creeping epidemic of youthful neurological degeneration gathers pace.

A MESSAGE FOR MICHAEL

Ms. Betty Martini of aspartame campaign group, Mission Possible International, does not mince words. In a statement on the Michael J. Fox controversy, she stated: “Aspartame is being used by 2/3rds of the population today and 40% of our children, and is a deadly neurotoxic drug. …We are now taking case histories for class action starting with brain tumors, seizures, eye deterioration and blindness triggered by aspartame. An investigation could be the beginning of help for millions.”

PETITION

We fan’s of Michael, Parkinson’s sufferers and ordinary citizens are concerned that he may be unknowingly worsening his condition with diet sodas containing aspartame.

As signatories, we call on the Michael J. Fox Foundation to represent the interests of Parkinson’s suffers — without fear or favor of the vested interests in medical research and industry. We call for… Read On….

It is worth stating that a virus cannot be sued by poisoned consumers, and a virus cannot be hauled to a Congressional investigation. Therefore a Parkinson’s virus will inevitably prove a far better candidate for scientific research dollars than aspartame.

The message for Michael is that aspartame is clearly not worth the risk to his health, and merits renewed review of it’s public safety. Unfortunately the research foundation that bears Michael’s name, has so far not even acknowledged the evidence sent to it by aspartame critics.

SickofDoctors.com has sponsored an online petition to alert Michael and his Parkinson’s foundation to the role of aspartame. You can help send this important message to Michael. After all, a previous petition that was featured at PetitionOnline.com prompted a response from Bill Gates’ Microsoft.

Join the Quit the Soda Petition All email addresses confidential held by PetitionOnline.com only.

URL OF THIS PAGE IS
http://www.sickofdoctors.addr.com/articles/quitthesoda.htm

mail@sickofdoctors.com
© 2002 SickofDoctors.com

– Fintan Dunne