Do All Our Beloved ’80s Media Stars Hate the Jews?

First, there was Mel Gibson, who has forever ruined the Lethal Weapon movies by showing how closely he actually hews to Martin Riggs — only if Riggs were racist, anti-Semitic and a woman-hater. And unnaturally obsessed with blow jobs. (Maybe Riggs was all those things – it’s in the subtext.)

And now it’s Oliver Stone, beloved, iconic director of “Platoon” and “Wall Street”, who blamed the “Jewish domination of the media” for Americans demonizing Hitler and overrating the importance of the Holocaust. Let justice be done though the heavens fall, indeed!

I admit to being a little confused — why, when Ollie had the chance in “World Trade Center”, didn’t he reveal that 9/11 was all part of an Israeli/liberal-Jew conspiracy? Missed opportunity.

But why do our ’80s stars hate the Jews so much? If Jews run the media and Hollywood (and the banks), shouldn’t the likes of Gibson and Stone simply say “thank you,” and be on their way?

What’s next? Is Tom Cruise going to turn out to be anti-Semitic also? Oh, wait…

from: http://popculturehasaids.wordpress.com/

Print Friendly

Mel Gibson’s Priest on the Holocaust

Mel Gibson Holocaust

“The Holocaust myth is now being challenged mightily by the movie ‘The Passion of the Christ.’ The Jews (and we do not speak of all Jews, but of many influential Jews such as Abe Foxman and the ADL, Rabbi Schmuley Boteach and Rabbi Marvin Hier of the Simon Wiesenthal Museum, and those who have control of the media) had almost succeeded in blotting out the name of Jesus from the consciousness of the people. The public had been carefully programmed through a relentless round of movies, documentaries and books, so as to have the guilt of the Holocaust constantly in mind. ‘Schindler’s List’ and the abominable book “Hitler’s Pope” in so demeaning and desecrating Pius XII’s good name, are perfect examples of this. They had turned the tables on us. Rather than the Jews being reputedly responsible for the death of Jesus Christ, we now had Christians, especially the Roman Catholic Church, bearing the guilt for the Holocaust.

“But with one fell swoop, this marvelous movie struck a nearly fatal blow to their carefully executed plan of convincing the world that the Holocaust is the pivotal event, the defining moment in human history, thus displacing the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ from that exalted position. This is the real explanation for their rage against Christ, and against this movie. They are afraid that Christians will begin to realize once again that the true Holocaust, the one perfect and acceptable sacrifice to God our Father, took place two thousand years ago on Calvary’s hill, when Jesus Christ shed His Precious Blood for the sins of the world. All human beings, whether Jews or Gentiles, of every place and of every time, must go to the foot of the Cross of Jesus and acknowledge Him as the Messiah, if they are to be saved.

“The Holocaust myth and the Sacrifice of Christ on Calvary are unalterably opposed to one another. If the Sacrifice of Christ on the Cross is the one perfect Sacrifice acceptable to God, the true Holocaust, and the one defining moment in human history, the Jewish Holocaust cannot be the unique event they claim it to be. It was a terrible atrocity, a great human tragedy, but not a perfect sacrifice offered to God; it was not redemptive; it cannot save anyone; it was not a holocaust, certainly not The Holocaust.

“But even the Vatican II church cooperates, resulting in its own demolition. John Paul II has apologized to the Jews for the sins of Christians against them, and has absolved them from the necessity of believing in Jesus Christ. Much was made of his “historic” trip to Jerusalem where his visit to the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial Museum was celebrated by the media. ‘The awful truth is this–that John Paul II and the New Vatican accept the myth of the Holocaust, thus denying the uniqueness and efficacy of the Sacrifice of Christ on Calvary, and of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.'”

– Father Campbell

Print Friendly

Mel Gibson Wants “Jew Blood”

Mel Gibson Jew Blood

Radar reports that Mel Gibson allegedly screamed that he wanted the Jewish blood of one of his enemies all over his hands. From Radar:

The anti-Semitic slur was allegedly made by Mel in reference to a high-profile Hollywood figure who is Jewish and who Mel believed had “publicly humiliated” him.

Gibson hired individuals to place this person under surveillance, Oksana told authorities.

“Oksana says Mel told her, ‘I want Jew blood on my hands,’ and said he wanted the person taken to the desert, stripped naked, knee capped and left in the heat,” a source close to one of the investigations involving Mel told RadarOnline.com exclusively.

Gibson never followed through with his threats.

Print Friendly

The Protector: Angelina Jolie Snake Jewelry

Jolie Snake Jewelry

The ‘Protector Collection’ features a serpent as Jolie is said to consider the reptile as an iconic guardian and protector of her family.

In Egyptian history, the snake occupies a primary role with the Nile cobra adorning the crown of the pharaoh in ancient times. It was worshipped as one of the gods and was also used for sinister purposes: murder of an adversary and ritual suicide.

In Christianity and Judaism, the snake makes its infamous appearance in the first book (Genesis 3:1) of the Bible when a serpent appears before the first couple Adam and Eve as an agent of the devil and tempts them with the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. The snake returns in Exodus when Moses, as a sign of God’s power, turns his staff into a snake and when Moses made the Nehushtan, a bronze snake on a pole that when looked at cured the people of bites from the snakes that plagued them in the desert. The serpent makes its final appearance symbolizing Satan in the Book of Revelation:”And he laid hold on the dragon the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.”

The Ouroboros is a symbol that is associated with many different religions and customs, and is also claimed to be related to Alchemy. The Ouroboros or Oroboros is a snake eating its own tail in a clock-wise direction (from the head to the tail) in the shape of a circle, representing manifestation of one’s own life and rebirth, leading to immortality.

In Neo-Paganism and Wicca, the snake is seen as a symbol of wisdom and knowledge.


guest1200 wrote: A snake in the bible is satan the devil!

Print Friendly

Jon Voight: God gave this land to the Jewish people



by Teresa Neumann : May 15, 2008 : Staff – Haaretz

The emotional actor is brought to tears as he meets with Israelis.

Jon Voight(Israel)—Haaretz News reports that Academy Award winning actor Jon Voight is currently in Israel to express his fervent support for the Jewish people during Israel’s 60th anniversary celebrations.

According to the report, on Tuesday, the actor visited Sderot, the western Negev town that suffers regular Qassam rockets strikes from the Gaza Strip and on Monday, he met with terror victims, and welcomed a group of children brought to Israel through Chabad’s Children of Chernobyl program.

A video, available for viewing by clicking on the link below, shows an emotional Voight brought to tears by his passion for Israel.

Print Friendly

Jon Voight Really, Really Loves Israel…Alot

GLENN: Are you more concerned about the economy and spending or are you more concerned about, for instance, the Middle East and Israel?

VOIGHT: Well, I’m concerned about all of that but I really, I’m really concerned about Israel. His attitude toward Israel really reveals that he knows nothing but the history of Israel and its importance to the United States. He spoke at Cairo University in a speech on June 4th and then he said there will be no dictating to other countries, you know, only forging partnerships and yet he certainly dictates to Israel to freeze all settlement activity which, you know, means no natural growth and that means strangling these towns to death, these thriving towns close to the 1949 armistice line that everybody, every negotiation over the past decade has envisioned Israel retaining. So he’s really destroying their ability to negotiate and to give and recommending that Israel gives more land away. Hasn’t he understood that every time Israel has given land in order to secure peace that all of the response has only been violence? Hasn’t he understood all of this? That Gaza has attacked Israel, they gave Gaza as a peace gesture and, you know, Hamas has used it to attack the south of Israel? It’s one wonders where he gets his information from and what his point of view is.

GLENN: John, why you’re awfully passionate about Israel. I am as well.

VOIGHT: I am indeed, yeah.

GLENN: Why?

VOIGHT: Well

GLENN: Because there’s a lot of people that will say, geez, these people having warring for 5,000 years, why should we even get involved? Why should we even care?

VOIGHT: Well, you know, certainly they are arguably our greatest ally in the world. We depend on their intelligence. We depend, we’re very tied to them, and they are the only democracy in that part of the world. And there are other aspects as well. But when we look at, you know, what Hitler said, Hitler in Mein Kampf laid it all out, didn’t he? There are some people who read Mein Kampf. Winston Churchill said, you know, they said, well, how did you know? He said, well, I read his book.

GLENN: Yeah.

VOIGHT: Well, we have heard Ahmadinejad and the Imam speak from Iran, wipe Israel from the geography of the land, from time. Israel is going to die they say. Aren’t we listening? Are we taking them seriously or not?
You know, it’s funny that you bring this up today because I was just meeting with the writers for television earlier this morning and I said this is where I’m headed today. And it’s that very point. I was driving in this morning and I’m hearing all of the news and I keep seeing these signposts pass. Nobody has everybody is in denial on everything.

VOIGHT: Yeah.

GLENN: They are, “Oh, well, we’re going to be able to grow our way out of it. Well, we’ll have to spend some money temporarily here. Well, we can just make friends with these people and we are denying everything that people are actually telling us. Somebody said it was Gretchen Carlson from Fox News who I adore. She is going to be on later. She was on yesterday’s show and she said, you know, Obama never said he would do these things. I said, yes, he has. Yes, he has. Nobody wants to say that the man is a Marxist. Okay, so he’s not a Marxist. He’s a progressive! This is semantics.

VOIGHT: Yes, it is.

GLENN: If you go back and you read what they said. What they said they were going to do in the early 20th century which Hillary Clinton in her own campaign speech said, you know, “I’m an early 20th century American progressive.” If you read what they said they were going to do, they’re doing it right now, and I feel like I read Mein Kampf as well, and when I read Mein Kampf, I read it because I wanted to know, did the German people know. Yes! Yes, they knew. Unless they were like, “Oh, well, no, he doesn’t mean that,” which is exactly what we’re doing now. Everybody’s just saying, “Well, no, they don’t… Ahmadinejad really doesn’t mean that.” Or, “He’s really not going to actually destroy the free market system.” Yes, he is. Yes, he is.

VOIGHT: Oh, yes.

GLENN: So how do you wake people up, John?

VOIGHT: I don’t know. I’m doing my best and you’re doing your best for sure, Glenn. It really is frightening. I mean, when Obama says you don’t know if you’re hearing properly when he says that Iran is perhaps entitled to nuclear power. And after all of these statements

GLENN: Yet we’re not.

VOIGHT: We’re seeing him head down this road. And you say, well, wait, we’ll check in December and see how far it’s gotten. It’s so alarming, it’s quite it’s almost unbelievable that we’re witnessing this kind of behavior.

GLENN: John, what is your life like

VOIGHT: Pretty good.

GLENN: Because you are in you’re in the hornet’s nest. You might as well just be covered in the honey.

Print Friendly

Illuminating Scene From “Girl Interrupted”

Daisy: Give me the Valium.
Lisa: We don’t need your daddy’s money.
Daisy: Then leave it there, just give me the fucking Valium.
(She extends her hand to Lisa and Lisa grabs her arm and pulls up the sleeve of her robe to reveal a badly-cut arm.)
Lisa: What’s this?
Daisy: (struggles to get free) Let go.
Lisa: What’s this, huh? Trying out your new silver?
Daisy: Get the fuck off me! (frees herself from Lisa’s grip and starts for the stairs)
Lisa: Less appealing for Daddy, hmm?
Susanna: Lisa…?
Daisy: Look at your own arm, asshole.
Lisa: I’m sick, Daisy, we know that, but here you are in so-called recovery, playing Betty Crocker, cut up like a goddamned Virginia Ham.
Susanna: Lisa, just stop it!
Lisa: (sits on a chair, holding her cigarette) Help me understand, Dais, ’cause I thought you didn’t do Valium. Tell me how the safety net is working for you…Tell me that you don’t take that blade and drag it across your skin and pray for the courage to press down. Tell me how your Daddy…
Susanna: (under breath) Christ.
Lisa: …helps you cope with that. Illuminate me.
Daisy: My father loves me.
Lisa: (nodding) I bet…with every inch of his manhood.
Susanna: (disgusted) Oh, God.
Daisy: I’m going to sleep now.
(Daisy walks upstairs. Lisa rocks back on chair and takes a drag on the cigarette.)
Daisy: Please be gone in the morning. You’re just jealous, Lisa, because I got better. Because I was released. Because I have a chance… at a life.
Lisa: They didn’t release you because you’re better, Daisy. They just gave up. You call this a life, hmm? Taking daddy’s money, buying your dollies and your knick-knacks, and eating his fucking chicken, fattening up like a prize fucking heifer? You changed the scenery, but not the fucking situation, and the warden makes house calls. And everybody knows… everybody knows (runs tongue across teeth) that he fucks you. But what they don’t know, is that you like it. Hmm? You like it.
Susanna: Shut the fuck up!
Lisa: But hey, man, it’s cool. It’s fine! It’s fucking fine! A man is a dick, is a man is a dick, is a chicken. Valium, speculum, whatever, hmm? Whatever. You like being Mrs. Randone. Probably all you’ve ever known.
Daisy: Have fun in Florida.
(Lisa gets up, moves to another chair, takes another drag and giggles.)
Lisa: Yeah.

Print Friendly

Jon Voight Loves Israel

Jon Voight Israel

An open letter from actor Jon Voight to President Obama:

June 22, 2010

President Obama:

You will be the first American president that lied to the Jewish people, and the American people as well, when you said that you would defend Israel, the only Democratic state in the Middle East, against all their enemies. You have done just the opposite. You have propagandized Israel, until they look like they are everyone’s enemy — and it has resonated throughout the world. You are putting Israel in harm’s way, and you have promoted anti-Semitism throughout the world.

You have brought this to a people who have given the world the Ten Commandments and most laws we live by today. The Jewish people have given the world our greatest scientists and philosophers, and the cures for many diseases, and now you play a very dangerous game so you can look like a true martyr to what you see and say are the underdogs. But the underdogs you defend are murderers and criminals who want Israel eradicated.

You have brought to Arizona a civil war, once again defending the criminals and illegals, creating a meltdown for good, loyal, law-abiding citizens. Your destruction of this country may never be remedied, and we may never recover. I pray to God you stop, and I hope the people in this great country realize your agenda is not for the betterment of mankind, but for the betterment of your politics.

With heartfelt and deep concern for America and Israel,

Jon Voight

Print Friendly

Jon Voight: Angelina has “Mental Problems”

Angelina Jolie Mental Problems

Jon Voight says Angelina needs to get help. The actor says his daughter has ”mental problems,” that he knew her marriage to Billy Bob Thornton was doomed, and that he hasn’t seen his grandson

By Gary Susman | Aug 02, 2002

In an emotional interview on Thursday’s ”Access Hollywood,” Jon Voight went public about his estrangement from daughter Angelina Jolie, pleading with her fans and handlers to see that she gets help for unspecified ”mental problems” now that she’s split with husband Billy Bob Thornton. He blamed himself for failure to act on her behalf, and he also begged his daughter to let him see his grandchild, the baby she and Thornton adopted just months before she filed for divorce last month.

Voight says his daughter, who won an Oscar for playing a mental patient in ”Girl, Interrupted,” began showing signs of mental illness as an infant. (He divorced Jolie’s mother before their daughter was a year old but says he remained a presence in her life.) He said he was ”brokenhearted…because I’ve been trying to reach my daughter and get her help, and I have failed and I’m sorry. Really I haven’t come forward and addressed the serious mental problems she has spoken about so candidly to the press over the years, but I’ve tried behind the scenes in every way.”

He said he had confronted his daughter a number of times. During the making of ”Girl,” he said she told him, ”You can’t help me! You can’t help my pain!” They had a brief reconciliation when they worked together on ”Lara Croft: Tomb Raider,” but it didn’t last. He said he tried to greet her recently at a Hollywood party, but her manager blocked him and said, ”She doesn’t want to see you.” (The manager tells the story differently, telling ”Access Hollywood” that he interceded because Voight ”aggressively, physically grabbed her against her will.”)

Because of his estrangement from his daughter, Voight said he hadn’t yet seen his grandson, Maddox, the year-old Cambodian boy Jolie and Thornton brought back to the U.S. in May. ”That is the greatest pain,” he said. ”I’d love to help out with the baby.”

Billy Bob Thornton, Voight’s son-in-law of two years, has problems too, Voight said. ”I never had the feeling that they were going to make it because of both of their serious problems, and they’ve both been very public about them, so I never really held out any hope.”

Jolie responded to Voight’s comments in a statement, saying ”I don’t want to make public the reasons for my bad relationship with my father. I will only say that, like every child, [brother] Jamie and I would have loved to have had a warm and loving relationship with our dad. After all these years, I have determined that it is not healthy for me to be around my father, especially now that I am responsible for my own child.”

Jolie is currently preparing to shoot the ”Tomb Raider” sequel, and producer Lawrence Gordon told ”Access Hollywood” that he was unaware of any problems she had that would jeopardize the big-budget franchise. ”I have an excellent team around her,” Gordon said. ”If there was a problem, I would know it.”

Print Friendly

Was Angelina Jolie Molested?

Angelina Jolie Brother Kiss

I’m really only exposed to bits and pieces of celebrity gossip due to my lack of interest but I read the latest news about Angeline Jolie with concern. Angelina is quoted as saying she was “very sexual in kindergarten”, that she created a game where she would kiss a boy, “Then we would make out and we would take our clothes off.”

My first thought was, if this is true, Angelina was molested as a child. In those few sentences Angelina has displayed the first five of the seven symptoms listed in this checklist of signs that a child is developing abnormally.

I have taken very little notice of Angelina Jolie over the years. All I really knew about her was that people said she was very weird.

I had visions of being the first to voice the idea, in this entry, that Angelina Jolie was sexually molested as a child but then I did some research. It seems the rumours have been going around for a long time with people saying her split with her father, Jon Voight, is due to him having molested her.

Others believe she has had an incestuous relationship with her brother thanks to a kiss she gave him when she won an award in 2000. Angelina is said to have accused people who thought her passionate kiss was incestual of being sick minded.

I’m not about to start guessing who has done what to Angelina but she is acting, and talking, like someone who was molested as a child. That is, of course, her business but one thing bothers me about all this and it bothers me a lot.

Angelina, in saying she was very sexual in kindergarten, is playing right into the hands of every paedophile in the world. She seems to be saying she wanted sexual activity as a small child. This is precisely what paedophiles believe and want the world to believe! In saying this she has made herself a “Poster Child” for the worlds paedophiles to use against children.

If she really believes she wanted sex, and there was nothing wrong with her wanting sex, at approximately four years of age then I am concerned about the safety of the children she is accumulating! If Angelina Jolie believes she wanted sex as a child she is likely to believe her children will also want sex at a young age.

Angelina has admitted to cutting herself as a teen and combining sex with violence and bloodshed.

“I had started having sex with my boyfriend and the sex and the emotions didn’t feel enough. I was no longer a little girl. In a moment of wanting to feel closer to my boyfriend I grabbed a knife and cut him. He cut me back,” she is reported to have said, “We had an exchange of something and we were covered in blood, my heart was racing. Then whenever I felt trapped, I’d cut myself. I have a lot of scars.”

This is precisely why children should not be introduced to sex too young! Sexual activity hurts children and causes them to develop abnormally.

Angelina seems to believe ordinary sex is something you do when you are a “little girl” and it was not, therefore, enough to make her feel really close to someone. She needed to spill her partners blood and have him spill hers to make sex special.

For most people sex is as intimate and close as it is possible to get to someone else. For Angelina Jolie it was childish. Exchanging bodies was not enough – she needed to exchange their life source – their blood.

What, I very much want to know, will it take for Angelina Jolie to feel close to her children???

According to gossip, Angelina is not able to feel as much for her own flesh and blood as she feels for her adopted children.

Many victims of child molestation fear becoming parents. However much they may be convinced their abuse was their own fault, or choice, there is a part of them that resists becoming like their abuser(s). Child molesters have no qualms about sex with children but they can sometimes find the idea of incest a little harder to make excuses for.

I’m not saying Angelina Jolie is a child molester. I am saying there is cause for serious concern when ANYONE describes ANY kindergarten aged child as “very sexual”.

How would people be reacting to her behaviour and these things she is saying if she were a male? How would people be viewing a kindergarten boy who forced kisses on his classmates and made them get naked so he could “make out” with them?

During my brief research into this topic I found people on forums saying, over and over again, that “Children are very sensual” and this is taken as having the same meaning as sexual.

Children are sensual – they are NOT sexual!

According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary the word sensual has two main meanings. They are as follows:

1. Of sense or sensation.

2. Of or depending on the senses only and not on the intellect or spirit, carnal, fleshly.

The second meaning goes on to expound about “sensual pleasures” and it is there that the sexual aspect of the word comes into play.

Children are sensual in that their whole world is made up of their five senses. It is for this reason they like to touch, taste, look, listen, and speak. They are also sensual in the second meaning of the word in that they depend WHOLLY on their senses and not at all on their intellect or spirit.

They do not, therefore, understand the consequences of anything they do and must be protected from those consequences until they have learned enough to take care of themselves.

Children like to touch but who would say that is a good enough reason to let them touch fire?

Children like to taste but who would say their wish to taste is a good enough reason to let them taste poison or put a razor blade in their mouth?

Just because a child wants to look, touch or taste, does not mean they are ready to experience being used, infected with sexually transmitted diseases, bruised, torn, or taught things that will turn them into someone society believes is “weird”.

No child deserves to be subjected to experiences that leave them needing to shed blood to feel close to someone they love!

Angelina Jolie exhibits all the symptoms of someone what was introduced to sex at far too young an age. Her activities in kindergarten are the behaviour of a child who is “acting out” sexual behaviour in an attempt to make sense of it.

Angelina Jolie was not a sexy preschooler, she was a sexualized preschooler, there is a difference. The sooner the world stops using children sexually and believing they want sex the sooner we will stop having people who cut themselves to cope with feeling trapped!

See this link for some tips on preventing child molestation.

written by Kim

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Print Friendly