• Sponsors
  • Conspirazzi Tweets
    • @ebertchicago bush is the fall guy 4 911 he's a puppet, a patsey 3 hours ago
    • @ the cafe 3 hours ago
    • i got three different scripts going right now & i have 2 more i want 2 do but the banking movie is going 2 b first. it's low budget indie 19 hours ago
    • fixed it. the dash in my script title was fucking it up. i'm writing a screenplay about money banking. took a screenwriting class last mumf 19 hours ago
    • the final draft 8 software i pirated isn't working properly. my laptop can't open the screenplays on my desktop. i'm frustrated 20 hours ago
  • Archives
  • Categories
  • Meta
  • The Protector: Angelina Jolie Snake Jewelry

    August 25, 2010

    Jolie Snake Jewelry

    The ‘Protector Collection’ features a serpent as Jolie is said to consider the reptile as an iconic guardian and protector of her family.

    In Egyptian history, the snake occupies a primary role with the Nile cobra adorning the crown of the pharaoh in ancient times. It was worshipped as one of the gods and was also used for sinister purposes: murder of an adversary and ritual suicide.

    In Christianity and Judaism, the snake makes its infamous appearance in the first book (Genesis 3:1) of the Bible when a serpent appears before the first couple Adam and Eve as an agent of the devil and tempts them with the forbidden fruit from the Tree of Knowledge. The snake returns in Exodus when Moses, as a sign of God’s power, turns his staff into a snake and when Moses made the Nehushtan, a bronze snake on a pole that when looked at cured the people of bites from the snakes that plagued them in the desert. The serpent makes its final appearance symbolizing Satan in the Book of Revelation:”And he laid hold on the dragon the old serpent, which is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years.”

    The Ouroboros is a symbol that is associated with many different religions and customs, and is also claimed to be related to Alchemy. The Ouroboros or Oroboros is a snake eating its own tail in a clock-wise direction (from the head to the tail) in the shape of a circle, representing manifestation of one’s own life and rebirth, leading to immortality.

    In Neo-Paganism and Wicca, the snake is seen as a symbol of wisdom and knowledge.

    guest1200 wrote: A snake in the bible is satan the devil!




    Illuminating Scene From “Girl Interrupted”

    Daisy: Give me the Valium.
    Lisa: We don’t need your daddy’s money.
    Daisy: Then leave it there, just give me the fucking Valium.
    (She extends her hand to Lisa and Lisa grabs her arm and pulls up the sleeve of her robe to reveal a badly-cut arm.)
    Lisa: What’s this?
    Daisy: (struggles to get free) Let go.
    Lisa: What’s this, huh? Trying out your new silver?
    Daisy: Get the fuck off me! (frees herself from Lisa’s grip and starts for the stairs)
    Lisa: Less appealing for Daddy, hmm?
    Susanna: Lisa…?
    Daisy: Look at your own arm, asshole.
    Lisa: I’m sick, Daisy, we know that, but here you are in so-called recovery, playing Betty Crocker, cut up like a goddamned Virginia Ham.
    Susanna: Lisa, just stop it!
    Lisa: (sits on a chair, holding her cigarette) Help me understand, Dais, ’cause I thought you didn’t do Valium. Tell me how the safety net is working for you…Tell me that you don’t take that blade and drag it across your skin and pray for the courage to press down. Tell me how your Daddy…
    Susanna: (under breath) Christ.
    Lisa: …helps you cope with that. Illuminate me.
    Daisy: My father loves me.
    Lisa: (nodding) I bet…with every inch of his manhood.
    Susanna: (disgusted) Oh, God.
    Daisy: I’m going to sleep now.
    (Daisy walks upstairs. Lisa rocks back on chair and takes a drag on the cigarette.)
    Daisy: Please be gone in the morning. You’re just jealous, Lisa, because I got better. Because I was released. Because I have a chance… at a life.
    Lisa: They didn’t release you because you’re better, Daisy. They just gave up. You call this a life, hmm? Taking daddy’s money, buying your dollies and your knick-knacks, and eating his fucking chicken, fattening up like a prize fucking heifer? You changed the scenery, but not the fucking situation, and the warden makes house calls. And everybody knows… everybody knows (runs tongue across teeth) that he fucks you. But what they don’t know, is that you like it. Hmm? You like it.
    Susanna: Shut the fuck up!
    Lisa: But hey, man, it’s cool. It’s fine! It’s fucking fine! A man is a dick, is a man is a dick, is a chicken. Valium, speculum, whatever, hmm? Whatever. You like being Mrs. Randone. Probably all you’ve ever known.
    Daisy: Have fun in Florida.
    (Lisa gets up, moves to another chair, takes another drag and giggles.)
    Lisa: Yeah.




    Jon Voight: Angelina has “Mental Problems”

    August 24, 2010

    Angelina Jolie Mental Problems

    Jon Voight says Angelina needs to get help. The actor says his daughter has ”mental problems,” that he knew her marriage to Billy Bob Thornton was doomed, and that he hasn’t seen his grandson

    By Gary Susman | Aug 02, 2002

    In an emotional interview on Thursday’s ”Access Hollywood,” Jon Voight went public about his estrangement from daughter Angelina Jolie, pleading with her fans and handlers to see that she gets help for unspecified ”mental problems” now that she’s split with husband Billy Bob Thornton. He blamed himself for failure to act on her behalf, and he also begged his daughter to let him see his grandchild, the baby she and Thornton adopted just months before she filed for divorce last month.

    Voight says his daughter, who won an Oscar for playing a mental patient in ”Girl, Interrupted,” began showing signs of mental illness as an infant. (He divorced Jolie’s mother before their daughter was a year old but says he remained a presence in her life.) He said he was ”brokenhearted…because I’ve been trying to reach my daughter and get her help, and I have failed and I’m sorry. Really I haven’t come forward and addressed the serious mental problems she has spoken about so candidly to the press over the years, but I’ve tried behind the scenes in every way.”

    He said he had confronted his daughter a number of times. During the making of ”Girl,” he said she told him, ”You can’t help me! You can’t help my pain!” They had a brief reconciliation when they worked together on ”Lara Croft: Tomb Raider,” but it didn’t last. He said he tried to greet her recently at a Hollywood party, but her manager blocked him and said, ”She doesn’t want to see you.” (The manager tells the story differently, telling ”Access Hollywood” that he interceded because Voight ”aggressively, physically grabbed her against her will.”)

    Because of his estrangement from his daughter, Voight said he hadn’t yet seen his grandson, Maddox, the year-old Cambodian boy Jolie and Thornton brought back to the U.S. in May. ”That is the greatest pain,” he said. ”I’d love to help out with the baby.”

    Billy Bob Thornton, Voight’s son-in-law of two years, has problems too, Voight said. ”I never had the feeling that they were going to make it because of both of their serious problems, and they’ve both been very public about them, so I never really held out any hope.”

    Jolie responded to Voight’s comments in a statement, saying ”I don’t want to make public the reasons for my bad relationship with my father. I will only say that, like every child, [brother] Jamie and I would have loved to have had a warm and loving relationship with our dad. After all these years, I have determined that it is not healthy for me to be around my father, especially now that I am responsible for my own child.”

    Jolie is currently preparing to shoot the ”Tomb Raider” sequel, and producer Lawrence Gordon told ”Access Hollywood” that he was unaware of any problems she had that would jeopardize the big-budget franchise. ”I have an excellent team around her,” Gordon said. ”If there was a problem, I would know it.”




    Was Angelina Jolie Molested?

    Angelina Jolie Brother Kiss

    I’m really only exposed to bits and pieces of celebrity gossip due to my lack of interest but I read the latest news about Angeline Jolie with concern. Angelina is quoted as saying she was “very sexual in kindergarten”, that she created a game where she would kiss a boy, “Then we would make out and we would take our clothes off.”

    My first thought was, if this is true, Angelina was molested as a child. In those few sentences Angelina has displayed the first five of the seven symptoms listed in this checklist of signs that a child is developing abnormally.

    I have taken very little notice of Angelina Jolie over the years. All I really knew about her was that people said she was very weird.

    I had visions of being the first to voice the idea, in this entry, that Angelina Jolie was sexually molested as a child but then I did some research. It seems the rumours have been going around for a long time with people saying her split with her father, Jon Voight, is due to him having molested her.

    Others believe she has had an incestuous relationship with her brother thanks to a kiss she gave him when she won an award in 2000. Angelina is said to have accused people who thought her passionate kiss was incestual of being sick minded.

    I’m not about to start guessing who has done what to Angelina but she is acting, and talking, like someone who was molested as a child. That is, of course, her business but one thing bothers me about all this and it bothers me a lot.

    Angelina, in saying she was very sexual in kindergarten, is playing right into the hands of every paedophile in the world. She seems to be saying she wanted sexual activity as a small child. This is precisely what paedophiles believe and want the world to believe! In saying this she has made herself a “Poster Child” for the worlds paedophiles to use against children.

    If she really believes she wanted sex, and there was nothing wrong with her wanting sex, at approximately four years of age then I am concerned about the safety of the children she is accumulating! If Angelina Jolie believes she wanted sex as a child she is likely to believe her children will also want sex at a young age.

    Angelina has admitted to cutting herself as a teen and combining sex with violence and bloodshed.

    “I had started having sex with my boyfriend and the sex and the emotions didn’t feel enough. I was no longer a little girl. In a moment of wanting to feel closer to my boyfriend I grabbed a knife and cut him. He cut me back,” she is reported to have said, “We had an exchange of something and we were covered in blood, my heart was racing. Then whenever I felt trapped, I’d cut myself. I have a lot of scars.”

    This is precisely why children should not be introduced to sex too young! Sexual activity hurts children and causes them to develop abnormally.

    Angelina seems to believe ordinary sex is something you do when you are a “little girl” and it was not, therefore, enough to make her feel really close to someone. She needed to spill her partners blood and have him spill hers to make sex special.

    For most people sex is as intimate and close as it is possible to get to someone else. For Angelina Jolie it was childish. Exchanging bodies was not enough – she needed to exchange their life source – their blood.

    What, I very much want to know, will it take for Angelina Jolie to feel close to her children???

    According to gossip, Angelina is not able to feel as much for her own flesh and blood as she feels for her adopted children.

    Many victims of child molestation fear becoming parents. However much they may be convinced their abuse was their own fault, or choice, there is a part of them that resists becoming like their abuser(s). Child molesters have no qualms about sex with children but they can sometimes find the idea of incest a little harder to make excuses for.

    I’m not saying Angelina Jolie is a child molester. I am saying there is cause for serious concern when ANYONE describes ANY kindergarten aged child as “very sexual”.

    How would people be reacting to her behaviour and these things she is saying if she were a male? How would people be viewing a kindergarten boy who forced kisses on his classmates and made them get naked so he could “make out” with them?

    During my brief research into this topic I found people on forums saying, over and over again, that “Children are very sensual” and this is taken as having the same meaning as sexual.

    Children are sensual – they are NOT sexual!

    According to the Concise Oxford Dictionary the word sensual has two main meanings. They are as follows:

    1. Of sense or sensation.

    2. Of or depending on the senses only and not on the intellect or spirit, carnal, fleshly.

    The second meaning goes on to expound about “sensual pleasures” and it is there that the sexual aspect of the word comes into play.

    Children are sensual in that their whole world is made up of their five senses. It is for this reason they like to touch, taste, look, listen, and speak. They are also sensual in the second meaning of the word in that they depend WHOLLY on their senses and not at all on their intellect or spirit.

    They do not, therefore, understand the consequences of anything they do and must be protected from those consequences until they have learned enough to take care of themselves.

    Children like to touch but who would say that is a good enough reason to let them touch fire?

    Children like to taste but who would say their wish to taste is a good enough reason to let them taste poison or put a razor blade in their mouth?

    Just because a child wants to look, touch or taste, does not mean they are ready to experience being used, infected with sexually transmitted diseases, bruised, torn, or taught things that will turn them into someone society believes is “weird”.

    No child deserves to be subjected to experiences that leave them needing to shed blood to feel close to someone they love!

    Angelina Jolie exhibits all the symptoms of someone what was introduced to sex at far too young an age. Her activities in kindergarten are the behaviour of a child who is “acting out” sexual behaviour in an attempt to make sense of it.

    Angelina Jolie was not a sexy preschooler, she was a sexualized preschooler, there is a difference. The sooner the world stops using children sexually and believing they want sex the sooner we will stop having people who cut themselves to cope with feeling trapped!

    See this link for some tips on preventing child molestation.

    written by Kim




    Angelina Jolie Bondage Pictures Surface

    Angelina Jolie Bondage Pictures

    Star has now published new photographs of Angelina Jolie, along with confident proclamations that the Hollywood couple will not stay together after the world sees them.

    In a cover story entitled “Angie & Brad: The Photos That Will Tear Them Apart!” the tabloid has published eight ‘never before seen’ photos of Angelina Jolie that place an emphasis on her wild side.

    Star has two sets of pictures taken in 1999 of Jolie that show the actress ‘with tape across her nipples, experimenting with bondage and spacing out during a heroin binge.”

    “The heroin-smoking, bed-hopping party girl Angelina was back then doesn’t exactly fit with her image today as a responsible mother of six children and a highly respected goodwill ambassador for the United Nations,” said Andrew Morton, who is exposing many of Angelina’s darkest ‘secrets’ in his new “Angelina: An Unauthorized Biography.”




    Hackers – 1995

    May 17, 2010

    Hackers Pyramid

    This movie starred a teenage Angelina Jolie. At the very end, just before the ending credits, the two hackers are looking at 3 buildings, that say crash and burn. On their computer screen there is the great seal of the Illuminati.




    Post tags:

    Angelina’s Book: War of Necessity, War of Choice by Richard Haass

    July 8, 2009

    Angelina Jolie Book

    Angelina Jolie recently joined the Council on Foreign Relations – an organization spawned from the infamous RIIA (Royal Institute of International Affairs), that every person interested in policy-making, or rather the making of global policy in a totally non-democratic and elitist fashion, knows all too well, and she’s just reading this piece of absolute drivel written by Richard N. Haas, who happens to be the CFR Chairman. So, she’s just doing her homework like a good girl, swallowing CFR proganda about the Iraq war, so that she doesn’t sound too stupid or uninformed when meeting with her new global elitist friends.




    ILLUMINATI SLAVE ANGELINA JOLIE JOINS THE CFR

    June 17, 2009

    Tombraider: The Last Revelation

    Posted By: ironwolf
    Date: Sunday, 25-Feb-2007 20:18:11

    Only in America.

    Our favorite Illuminati Mind Controlled Slave Angelia Jolie has joined the Illuminati division called “Council on Foreign Relations”

    She makes Lara Croft movies where her father was a “member of the Illuminati”.

    She allows her masters to tattoo a reptilian on her body.

    She is a member of the U.N.

    She drinks blood.

    She uses magik to charm Brad Pitt. (Bat powder??)

    She is bi-sexual.

    Her perversions with Billy Bob are legendary

    She could easily be elected to the senate

    “On Friday night, the council’s membership accepted Jolie’s nomination – meaning she will soon be rubbing elbows with other club members such as Dick Cheney, Condoleezza Rice, Henry Kissinger, Colin Powell and Alan Greenspan”

    Looks like they are going to have a dinner party.

    And she is the main meal.

    ironwolf




    Lara Croft Battles the Illuminati

    Lara Croft Tombraider

    Illuminati: a group of “devious dangerous men who seek to fulfill an ancient prophesy.”

    The Bavarian Illuminati are also called the Illuminated Seers of the Eschaton. To immanentize the eschaton means trying to make the eschaton (the transcendent, uncreated, spiritual, or future; the end of days, to trigger the apocalypse, see eschatology).




    Jolie: the Pretty Face of the Global Slave Gulag

    Angelina Jolie

    It’s official. The “UN Goodwill Ambassador” Angelina Jolie will front for the
    “prestigious” NWO “think tank,” the Council on Foreign Relations. “Angelina
    Jolie will now be joining former presidents Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter,
    current Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Diane Sawyer and several other
    distinguished names as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations,”
    TransWorldNews reports. “The bombshell Oscar winner-turned globe-trotting
    activist is one of 94 new ‘term members’-a category reserved for up-and-coming
    young policy thinkers in their early 30s, most from the corporate world,
    government, academia or the media, who after their five-year terms can apply to
    join the ‘life membership’ ranks of Cheney, Soros, Greenspan, Kissinger, etc.
    What this means for Angelina: a chance to kibitz with top global policy
    experts. What this means for CFR: more paparazzi,” adds the CIA’s favorite
    newspaper, the Washington Post.

    One is reminded of the actress Lana Turner cavorting with mobster Johnny
    Stompenado, or maybe Liz Renay’s relationship with racketeer Mickey Cohen. Of
    course, chances are slim to none Jolie will take up with the hoary and criminal
    likes of Cheney, Soros, Greenspan, or Kissinger, although she may as well,
    considering the fact she has in essence become a whore for the ruling elite,
    attaching her “paparazzi” celebrity glow to an organization determined to
    reduce the world to a one-world slave labor gulag based on the China model of
    medieval feudalism at the behest of transnational mercantile capitalism. Of
    course, most Americans remain clueless of this agenda, even as the CFR works
    diligently to erode their endangered sovereignty. “Most Americans who are even
    aware of the CFR consider its objectives as visionary rather than a pressing
    political certainty or reality. Senators, Congressmen, and others in some
    branch of government service, doubtless for the most part consider an
    invitation to CFR membership as an honor,” notes Noah W. Hutchings, “and after
    all, CFR membership enhances political career opportunities and potentiality.”

    But never mind. As we know, or rather as the corporate media would have us
    believe, “the merging of the governments of Canada, the United States and
    Mexico,” otherwise known as the North American Union, as sketched out by the
    CFR’s Robert Pastor, is an “urban legend,” part of the insanity of “the
    xenophobic or frightened right wing of America that is afraid of immigration
    and globalization,” as Pastor told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. In other words,
    if you are suspicious of the so-called Security and Prosperity Partnership,
    i.e., the merging of Mexico, Canada, and the United States into a European
    style “union,” you are naturally a tinfoil hat nutter, never mind Benn Steil,
    writing for the CFR’s “influential” Foreign Affairs magazine, who tells us “the
    world needs to abandon unwanted currencies, replacing them with dollars, euros,
    and multinational currencies as yet unborn.”

    As James Madison warned the people of Virginia in 1799, a “nation which reposes
    on the pillow of political confidence, will sooner or later end its political
    existence in a deadly lethargy,” as it should be realized there is “a degree of
    depravity in mankind which requires a certain degree of circumspection and
    distrust.”

    It is sincerely unfortunate the American people no longer embrace this
    “circumspection and distrust” and instead believe, thanks to decades of
    brainwashing via public education and the incessant babble of 24/7 television,
    that government is our friend and the president has our best wishes at heart.
    Indeed, not only is government our friend, but the CFR, and thus the World
    Bank, IMF, Rockefeller and Ford foundations, et al, are our friends, never mind
    friends unrealized by most.

    Thus Angelina Jolie is the pretty face on the other end of Orwell’s “boot
    stamping on a human face-forever.” It is sincerely disturbing to realize most
    Americans will conclude, that is if they ever formulate the thought, the CFR,
    the North American Union, NAFTA and CAFTA resulting in jobs shipped to China,
    the vacuum created in the wake of the mugging and disappearance of the
    Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and the imposition of the panopticon and
    high-tech surveillance state are all in our best interest because our cherished
    celebrities tell us so.

    How easily most of us are bamboozled.

    -Kurt Nimmo




    Older Posts »